Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kei Watanabe's avatar

Thank you for featuring glasp.co!

Syd Malaxos's avatar

They Saved 10 Hours a Week. What Did They Lose?

A newsletter told me AI plugins are "how you stay competitive in 2026." It forgot to mention what gets competed away.

I got a newsletter this week. It listed eight AI browser plugins that supposedly save 5-10 hours a week. Grammarly writes your emails. Compose AI finishes your sentences. Fireflies takes your meeting notes. Perplexity reads your articles for you.

The pitch: why spend 30 minutes writing an email when you could spend 2 minutes?

The answer nobody asked: because the 28 minutes you skipped were the thinking.

I teach chemistry and physics. I've watched this exact pattern play out in classrooms for over twenty years — not with browser plugins, but with calculators, Google, and now ChatGPT.

A student gets a problem. There's a gap between what they know and what the problem demands. For about four seconds, they sit in that gap. Then they reach for the tool.

Not because they're lazy. Because nothing in their education ever required them to stay in the gap. Nobody designed the pause. The whole system is optimized for speed — reduce confusion, minimize frustration, deliver the answer, move to the next standard.

That newsletter is the adult version of the same pattern. The gap is where the thinking happens. The plugin skips the gap. And we call it productivity.

Here's what actually happens when you let Grammarly write your emails for 2 minutes instead of 30:

You stop noticing your own voice. You stop choosing your own words. You stop thinking about what you actually mean before you say it. The email gets sent faster. The thinking gets thinner. And after six months of 2-minute emails, you couldn't write a 30-minute one if your job depended on it.

That's not productivity. That's atrophy dressed up as efficiency.

The newsletter ended with this: "The gap between someone using these tools and someone not? It's massive. Don't get left behind."

I agree with half of that. The gap is massive. But it's not between people who use AI and people who don't. It's between people who think first and use AI to extend — and people who let AI think for them and call it winning.

One of those people can function without the tool. The other can't.

That's the gap that matters.

Your child can get any answer in seconds. I teach them what to do when the answer isn't enough.

Syd Malaxos is a chemistry and physics teacher with over 20 years of experience. He is the founder of Thinking Labs by Temple Academy and the author of Cognitive Sovereignty Under Compression, available on Amazon, Apple Books, Barnes & Noble, Kobo, and everywhere books are sold.

Free cognitive assessment: cognitive-gap-assessment.vercel.app

Browse courses and workbooks: smalax5.gumroad.com

thinkinglabs.academy · Substack

"Love is law. Let your lantern burn bright."

No posts

Ready for more?